Junotane Korea

Junotane Korea

Share this post

Junotane Korea
Junotane Korea
Understanding continuity in South Korea’s foreign policy
Commentary

Understanding continuity in South Korea’s foreign policy

Yoon has left the building - but what happens to his foreign policy ideas?

May 12, 2025
∙ Paid
7

Share this post

Junotane Korea
Junotane Korea
Understanding continuity in South Korea’s foreign policy
5
Share

Yoon has left the building - but what happens to his foreign policy ideas? What happens to closer South Korea - U.S. relations, closer South Korea - Japan relations, and closer trilateral relations? What happens to South Korea’s burgeoning relationship with NATO? And let’s not forget the Indo-Pacific Strategy and the “Audacious” plan for North Korea?

They are all but gone. Continuity in foreign policy is not South Korea’s strong spot.

South Korea’s foreign policy is trapped in five-year (okay, let’s say indeterminate) cycles of reinvention. Each new presidential administration, eager to establish its own legacy, discards, rebrands, or reinvents the foreign policy initiatives of its predecessor. The structural features of South Korea’s political system make continuity more the exception than the norm. The causes are well known.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jeffrey Robertson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share